The Legal Examiner Affiliate Network The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner search feed instagram google-plus avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close
Skip to main content
Medical Prescription For Medicinal Vape Pen Cannabis Marijuana Use On Vintage Wood
Grewal Law, PLLC
(888) 211-5798

In a monumental change of course, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued a landmark published opinion on February 11, 2021 with its decision in People v Thue. The case concerned whether Mr. Thue, a medical marijuana patient, could have his probation revoked for using medical marijuana while on probation. The Michigan Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that medical marijuana patients and caregivers who comply with the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act (“MMMA”) are immune from penalty in any manner and cannot have their probation revoked for using medical marijuana so long as they comply with the MMMA.

In reaching its decision, the Court of Appeals reaffirmed that Section 4 of the MMMA offers immunity to medical marijuana patients and caregivers from suffering penalty in any matter so long as they comply with the requirements for Section 4 immunity. The Court of Appeals further held that revocation of probation qualifies as a penalty. As a result, a patient or caregiver who qualifies for Section 4 immunity cannot be made to suffer that penalty. Further, the Court noted that the MMMA preempts all other laws that are inconsistent with the MMMA. As a result, the provisions of the Michigan Probation Act that would otherwise permit a court to prohibit marijuana use for probations are unenforceable for MMMA-compliant behavior.

In other words, thanks to the Court of Appeals decision in Thue, medical marijuana patients and caregivers in Michigan cannot be forced to give up their medical marijuana when they are on probation so long as they remain compliant with the MMMA. This is a monumental victory for medical marijuana patients in Michigan, as one of the biggest concerns for every medical marijuana patient facing criminal charges is whether they will be forced to stop using their medicine or risk possible jail or prison time. Thanks to last week’s decision by the Court of Appeals, medical marijuana patients no longer have to face that difficult choice.

It is important to note that medical marijuana patients have the burden of showing that they remain in compliance with the MMMA to avoid facing possible issues on probation. If you are a medical marijuana patient, this means you must pay close attention to the requirements to qualify for Section 4 immunity under the MMMA. If you engage in conduct that does not fall within the protection of Section 4 immunity, you could still face a probation violation.

Important questions still remain as to whether the Court’s decision in Thue offers protection for medical marijuana patients to continue to use medical marijuana while on bond for a pending charge. The Court’s rationale certainly seems to suggest that the MMMA also protects a medical marijuana patient’s ability to use medical marijuana while on bond for a pending criminal offense, but this is still an open issue.

In addition, because Michigan’s recreational marijuana law, the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (“MRTMA”), shares virtually all of the same statutory language that the Court of Appeals relied upon to reach its decision in the Thue case, there remains a question of whether adults over the age of 21 in Michigan can be forced to stop using recreational marijuana while on bond or probation.

For example, Section 5 of the MRTMA provides that adults age 21 and up in Michigan cannot be subject to “penalty in any matter” for engaging in conduct that is protected by the MRTMA. This is the same language that the Court of Appeals relied upon from the MMMA in reaching its decision in Thue. Further, Section 4 of the MRTMA has the same kind of preemption language that appears in the MMMA. As a result, it would appear that the Thue opinion opens the door for an argument that a court may not prohibit MRTMA-compliant marijuana activity as a condition of probation. This issue will undoubtedly be litigated in a future case.

For now, the Thue decision is limited to medical marijuana patients and caregivers. If you’re a medical marijuana patient or caregiver on probation, you should contact your probation officer to advise them of the Thue opinion and ask for them to make a request of the judge to modify your probation conditions. If your probation officer or judge is unwilling to comply with this request, contact the Cannabis Law attorneys at Grewal Law PLLC for a free consultation.

One Comment

  1. Gravatar for Scott
    Scott

    I'm a card carrying medical patient for chronic pain of fibromyalgia, along with seizure issues. I had a third DUI in Michigan after 16 years and was forced to go into Sobriety Court. I'm over 13 months sober from alcohol and have been restricted from access to cannabis at the same time, making it hard to function (COVID delayed sentencing, I have at least 9 more months of Sobriety Court and drug testing). Even after this ruling, they refuse to allow it. Even with a prescription. It is the only medication that works for me. I've been suffering for over six years. Marijuana had nothing to do with my charges. 61st District Court. I'm on an alcohol interlock device for my car. I've never violated or tested for any drugs. It's frustrating.

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.

Please do not include personal details in your comment. To message the author privately instead, click here.

Contacting the author via this website, either publicly or privately, does not create an attorney–client privilege.