The Legal Examiner Affiliate Network The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner search instagram avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner
Skip to main content

Conceived in paperback on April 1, 2016 (no less), Welcome to Dumbfuckistan: The Dumbed-Down, Disinformed, Dysfunctional, Disunited States of America, by Ian Gurvitz, predicted our most recent election.  Ian is a Hollywood-based TV writer and producer.  My take-away is Dumbfuckistan is located somewhere between your right and left ear.

The right question is: where is the meaning in life? Meaning is a man-made concept.  It’s something we infer from those experiences that are self-evidently good, and stem from a feeling of joy and wonder.  Meaning is not something that occurs in the future.  It exists in the here and now, within the fact that our lives are finite. – Ian Gurvitz

This question posed takes me to my most favorite book, Man’s Search for Meaning, authored by Viktor E. Frankl, with more than 12 million copies in print worldwide, and dedicated to the memory of his mother.  This book explores, in a way no other has, the most basic principle of life – “He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how” – Fredrich Wilhelm Nietzche.

What are the political ramifications of this election?  In 2004, Thomas Frank wrote What’s the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America.  The book explores the rise of populist anti-elitist conservatism in the US.  In the late 19th century, Kansas was known as the hotbed of the left-wing populist movement, but in recent decades it has become hardcore red.  Boiled down, the book examines the conundrum of how people suffering financial hardship can be voting for the same person the leaders of the largest corporations are voting for – one of them is voting against their own economic interests.  Then came President Obama, he understood that with 1/3 of America he had no shot.  One third of America he didn’t have to convince, we were with him.  So he focused like a laser on the 1/3 in the middle.  And he realized after watching Howard Dean’s campaign explode and then implode, that the internet, and specifically social media, has fundamentally changed politics.  This is not to say well-placed, well-produced, targeted TV ads aren’t game changers – they are.  The key is, if you are on a budget, to find the most eyeballs in the 1/3 middle at the cheapest price.  See Data You Can Believe In, The New York Times Magazine, 6/20/2013.

What happened in this election for Hillary Clinton and really the Democratic National Party is that they didn’t understand the undecided voters and all thought without much question she was the most qualified candidate based on experience we ever had for the position of President.  She was a deeply flawed candidate – more flawed than I realized until conducting a post-mortem focus group this past Sunday morning.  She was in no way more deeply flawed than her opponent, who won, he is a better salesman.  We are all selling something, some sell products, some real estate, medicine, law, and some sell themselves.  A good huckster can sell almost anything.

I dedicate this blog to all my trolls who permeate my Facebook page.  I welcome their objective, non-abusive comments.  The unwelcome comments – you know who you are – that attempt to, if you can believe it, tell me what to do and how to behave, you know what you can do.  “Everything can be taken from a man but one thing; the last of the human freedoms – to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to chose one’s own way.”  – Viktor Frankl.  Two people had the authority to construct how I behave, my dad (who I didn’t always agree with) and my mom, who I always agreed with.

Thank you for your time – any constructive criticism is welcome.  Happy Peaceful and Safe Thanksgiving to all.

5 Comments

  1. Gravatar for Min and Ed
    Min and Ed

    The more I learn about trump, every day since the election, the more I'm convinced the the people of the US made an unforgivable error of judgement. Let's pray for peace, health and stability at our Thanksgiving table.

  2. Gravatar for Randi
    Randi

    I agree that non of us realized how flawed and unliked HRC is. I still would never vote for DT under any circumstance though and can't understand how any minority or woman could either. Can I share this post with my Equal group?

  3. Gravatar for Steve Lombardi
    Steve Lombardi

    I agree with the premise of "What happened in this election for Hillary Clinton and really the Democratic National Party is that they didn’t understand the undecided voters and all thought without much question she was the most qualified candidate based on experience we ever had for the position of President. She was a deeply flawed candidate – more flawed than I realized until conducting a post-mortem focus group this past Sunday morning. She was in no way more deeply flawed than her opponent, who won, he is a better salesman. We are all selling something, some sell products, some real estate, medicine, law, and some sell themselves. A good huckster can sell almost anything.", and believe another major factor was working, bigotry, which did not have to be sold. Bigots suffer from bigotry and to persuade a bigot you don't really have to "sell", only to suggest. Sexism in my friends was obvious to me, just as racism was obvious concerning how they viewed President Obama. They were just as readily willing to blame "Crooked Hillary" as they were to blame President Obama for whatever someone/anyone suggested no matter how outlandish or lacking in proof. Enough said, well written. And yes, being from Iowa we are squarely in Dumbfuckistan.

  4. Gravatar for David
    David

    Of course Randi, U may share with anyone and everyone...remember, HRC is ahead by 2+million popular votes, and lost the EC vote by just over 100k votes in 3 States, Wisc, MI and Ohio...Dec 19th is the EC certification date.

  5. Gravatar for Bob Watts
    Bob Watts

    David, Great piece. I agree with most of it and really enjoyed it. The false equivalency that he was able to "sell" of the the email v. all the things for which he stood was only part of it. I have listened to the interviews with his supporters of his last week, and those that voted for economic reasons truly (and sadly) believe that they will get their jobs back in a year or "two at the most." That would mean reversing structural economic changes going back 50 years. I think many of the rest of the independent and undecided supporters (which I equate with "uninformed") just voted for him because he entertained them.

Comments for this article are closed.