The Legal Examiner Affiliate Network The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner search feed instagram google-plus avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner
Skip to main content
| Grewal Law, PLLC

For decades, unions have been protecting and representing many workers in Michigan, giving them a fair shot against corporate bargaining interests. Recently, however, so-called “right-to-work” proposals have been catching on under Republican Governor Rick Snyder’s administration. “Right-to-work” laws, which should really be called “anti-union” laws, would prohibit employers and unions from requiring a worker to join a union and make collection of dues much more difficult. As a result, unions would lose much, maybe all, of their bargaining power.

If you look past the rhetoric, is becomes clear that anti-union legislation has very little correlation with job availability. Nevada, Florida, Georgia, and both Carolinas have unemployment rates over 10% (the national average is 9.1%), and all are so-called “right-to-work” states. With an overcrowded labor pool and no collective bargaining power, each individual employee is on his or her own against the employer – often a large corporation. As we have seen in Wisconsin and elsewhere, union-busting can have dire consequences for ordinary workers.

Labor and union members who wanted a change from term-limited Governor Granholm’s policies in 2008 may be second-guessing themselves now. Big business is on the verge of getting the upper hand, with no guarantee of a better job climate. As 2012 comes around, employees in all sectors should seriously consider the long-term impact these pro-corporate measures would have.

One Comment

  1. Gravatar for Freeborn Man
    Freeborn Man

    The issue is not economics - it is personal freedom. I firmly support the right for people to organize and join unions. I also firmly support the right of people NOT to join unions (political parties, religious organizations or whatever)

    Whenever you start requiring membership in organizations as a pre-requisite for the basic processes of living, you are entering dangerous territory - the realm of Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union in requiring party membership in order to obtain work or have a shot at advancement. I'm not comparing labor unions to totalitarian organizations, but I'm pretty sure they would like to have that degree of control when it comes to the workplace

Comments are closed.