The Legal Examiner Mark The Legal Examiner Mark The Legal Examiner Mark search twitter facebook feed linkedin instagram google-plus avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close
Skip to main content

Earlier this week, a jury in Oregon awarded $1.4 million to a man who was sexually abused by a Scoutmaster over 25 years ago. According to the victim, the Boy Scouts of America negligently allowed the Scoutmaster to remain affiliated with the organization despite the Scoutmaster’s admission in 1983 that he molested over a dozen young boys. The Boy Scouts of America now faces a separate phase of the trial in which they could be found liable for up to $25 million in punitive damages.

During their deliberations, the jury was allowed to look through the Boy Scouts’ so-called “perversion files,” which are said to contain information about alleged child molesters in the Scouts organization. The Boy Scouts fought to keep those records confidential, but were ultimately required to release that information following a decision by the Oregon Supreme Court in February.

The Oregon Boy Scouts case has many similarities to the widely reported allegations of the sexual abuse of children by members of the Catholic clergy. The “pedophile priest” cases have attracted global attention, with incidents arising in Canada, Mexico, Australia, Ireland, Germany, and elsewhere. One of the main issues in dispute is what, and when, the Vatican knew about the alleged abuses.

The success of the plaintiff in the Oregon case is, unfortunately, an aberration. Due to strict statutes of limitations in many states, a large number of people who were victims of sexual abuse decades ago will be unable to pursue legal recourse. In many cases, the victims have repressed memories of the trauma they endured as children, or are otherwise unaware that the conduct they have experienced constitutes a legal cause of action. Many states, including Michigan, do not recognize these conditions as any exception to the standard statute of limitation. As a result, very few adults who discover later in life that they were sexually abused as children can receive their day in court. This is true even when the perpetrator admits the abusive conduct.

Sexual abuse of minors is a terrible and insidious act. It is time for victims to have the opportunity to seek justice and fair compensation from our legal system. Restrictive statutes of limitations, along with narrow interpretations rendered by the courts, add insult to these horrible injuries. If you feel that it is time for a change, contact your state representative and senators.

One Comment

  1. Gravatar for Terri Lynn

    These type of situations prove the strong rising beliefs there is no more reason for a parent of young girls to worry any more than parents of boys. Not at any age.......the same thing that can happen to a girl or young woman can happen to a boy or young man(rape, molestation, its all the same). Too much emphasis has been historically put on protection of the proverbial feeble female, which only serves to make them more the victim. The same thing with the false notion that the act of "serving the nation" at war is any more cut out for a boy or man than a girl or woman, which it is not. Common sense humanity would bring any good person with God in their soul to realize that nothing is as gender specific as all that. I am a woman, and have this insight. I read something like this, and feel frightend to let my 6 year old son go into any public restroom alone, which I would never do. Despite any rediculous sign "boys 6 and over must use appropriate restroom. NOT! It makes no sense, to potenially jeopardize the physical and emotional health and well being of a child just to preserve the ladies "privacy".

Comments are closed.

Of Interest