Skip to content

Texting Case Tests the Limits of Liability – Texter Now Sued – Should Phone Manufacturers Be Next?

You knew it was coming. Laws in many states have already made it illegal to text while driving. There have been plenty of lawsuits filed against negligent drivers who compromised their ability to…

You knew it was coming.  Laws in many states have already made it illegal to text while driving.  There have been plenty of lawsuits filed against negligent drivers who compromised their ability to keep other drivers and pedestrians safe by just having to read, respond to, or generate a text message on their phone while driving – sometimes on the highway, sometimes frequently while on the highway.

But in the back of my mind, I knew the next step had to be coming.  The lawsuit against a person who sends a text message to someone while they are driving.  And it's been filed and being argued in New Jersey, which has certainly suffered its fair share of injuries and casualties at the hands of a distracted, texting, oblivious driver.

David and Linda Kubert are still alive.  What they lack, however, are each of their left legs.  Both of them have lost their left legs after being struck by a 19-year-old boy who was texting while driving his pick up truck, causing him to cross the center lane and collide headfirst with the Kuberts while they were riding on a motorcycle.

Truck versus motorcycle is not fair.  It wouldn't have happened if the 19-year old hadn't responded to a text message he received from a girl named Shannon Colonna.  Now the attorney for the Kuberts has included her in his lawsuit on their behalf.  The judge in that case will decide by May 25th if she should be held accountable for the Kuberts' injury.  That's debatable, as the articles I've read suggest she may have known he was driving.

I have a free app for my Android phone called Dont_Text.  It's fairly easy, simple to use, and automatically texts people back whatever message I preset when I turn on the app.  But there are better, albeit expensive, options.  The truth is – the technology is there to do it NOW for most phones out there.  There is one app that specifically disables a phone's texting function when it detects the phone is moving faster than 10 mph.  It's called Textecution.

The technology exists.  Why isn't it being implemented?

My guess is phone companies don't want to actually upset customers with safety devices that go counter to what the high demand is all about.  Why would they want to fully utilize the GPS capacities of their smart phones (if you have an Android Phone, iPhone, or most Blackberry phones your phone has this capacity) to keep everyone safe?  A) It would diminish the number of texts that are received and sent, meaning fewer profits, and B) what cool kid wants the lame phone that won't let you text and drive?

God, who wants to avoid heart attacks just because my diet supplement is extremely hazardous?  Sometimes, we pride ourselves too much on this notion of choice and freedom.  It's not a freely made choice if we're already told what to want through billions of dollars of advertising, marketing, and slick placement in our favorite movies and tv shows.

I'm sure one day we'll get the standards well established on whether someone sending a text should be held liable for causing an injury when the person they are texting gets in an accident.  But what I really hope is that one day, the industry that has all the power to stop it, is actually forced to do something about this growing epidemic.

Tags: Legal

More in Legal

See all

More from Diego Avila

See all