05242017Headline:

Lansing, Michigan

HomeMichiganLansing

Email David Mittleman David Mittleman on LinkedIn David Mittleman on Facebook David Mittleman on Avvo
David Mittleman
David Mittleman
Attorney • (888) 227-4770

Michigan Auto Insurance Assessment Should Be Scrutinized

2 comments

Starting this summer, Michigan motorists will be paying more than ever before in per-vehicle statutory assessment fees to help insurance companies cover the cost of devastating motor vehicle injuries. The fee is set by the Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association (MCCA), which spreads the risk of financial loss where injured victims require more than $500,000 in medical care as a result of auto accidents. However, the MCCA sets its fee without any transparency or accountability.

Under Michigan’s No Fault law, a person injured in a car crash is entitled to lifetime medical benefits for care and rehabilitation related to the accident. This system allows for reasonable certainty in getting medical bills paid and gives injured people a chance to get their lives back. Yet insurance companies, which continue to post considerable profits, would have you believe the system and "soaring" costs are running them into the ground. In reality, the number of MCCA claims is expected to decrease this year, so why the jump in the statutory fee? One possibility is that insurance companies and the MCCA are trying to undermine support for Michigan’s No Fault system. Without disclosure of the MCCA’s accounting methods, we may never know the basis for the needlessly high assessments.

It is important to remember that the No Fault, personal injury protection (PIP) system as it currently exists is relatively pro-consumer. Any change that caps PIP benefits would simply shift the cost of care to the victims and to government-sponsored programs such as Medicaid and Medicare while protecting private insurance companies.

The Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association should open its books and explain its record-setting fee. Once the truth comes out, its motives will become clear.

2 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  1. Dave says:
    up arrow

    It’s past due to reform MCCA funding sources. Behavior that increases the risk of serious injury on public roads should pay a higher portion. When points are awarded to drivers who flaunt suspended licenses, drive uninsured, drive impaired etc, then nondiscretionary and separate court costs should directly fund MCCA. Impound repeat offenders’ vehicles, and sell them with proceeds going to MCCA. Use these and similar proceeds to reduce MCCA’s annual balance and then spread the remaining balance across all registered vehicles.
    Now, which state legislator with a backbone is willing to push this issue in Lansing? Judges who hold offenders prison time in abeyance are adding insult to injuryfor those who try their best to follow the law. Is anyone holding a seriously injured victim’s pain in abeyance?

  2. maegarcia says:
    up arrow

    I would recommend this health insurance plan i found through “Wise Medical Insurance” to anyone with a growing family who is looking to minimize their medical expenses.